Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 990 A2D 424 - Ross v. State

Ross v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc. · Centaur Partners, IV v. National Intergroup, Inc. · Daniels v. State · Grand Ventures, Inc. v. Whaley · In Re the Adoption of Swanson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the statute as a whole is unambiguous and there is no reasonable doubt as to the meaning of the words used, the court's role is limited to an application of the literal meaning of those words.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[t]he legislative intent underlying the habitual offender statute is to insure that a defendant has had an opportunity to correct a pattern of criminal conduct before the imposition of an enhanced penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “when the word 'means' is employed in defining a word or term, the definition is limited to the meaning given.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.