Durning’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2016
3 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Alexander v. United States · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'must be commenced within one year after the discovery of the facts constituting the violation and within three years after such violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) 'that the racketeering predicates are related,' and (2) that the predicates 'amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.