United States v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
990 F.2d 119 · 1993
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Queen (1997), United States v. Kennedy (1994)
35 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stirone v. United States · Santoni v. United States · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Raphan v. United States · Zerman v. Melton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence to show intent is not admissible when the unrelated bad act is 'tenuous and remote in time from the charges in the indictment.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“so preposterous that it could not be believed by a rational and properly instructed juror.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“this does not throw open the door to any sort of other crimes evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.