Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 990 F.2d 1531 - Central Arizona Water Conservation District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Central Arizona Water Conservation District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Empirical Analysis

990 F.2d 1531 · 1993

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2020
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 14 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2020 · most notably Arizona Cattle Growers' Associatio v. United States Fish and Wildlife Bureau of Land Management, Diego Militia v. Reno (1996)

40 federal appellate · 14 district ·

4101993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 7410 · 42 U.S.C. § 7411 · 42 U.S.C. § 7470 · 42 U.S.C. § 7472 · 42 U.S.C. § 7491 · 42 U.S.C. § 7492 · 42 U.S.C. § 7607 · 42 U.S.C. § 7651B

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as may be necessary to make reasonable progress toward”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in mandatory class I Federal areas.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any air pollutant which may reasonably be anticipated to cause or contribute to any impairment of visibility”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.