Klaudt’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2021
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · McKart v. United States · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“designate the judgment, order, or part thereof appealed from”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The federal regulations provide that administrative procedures must be followed before seeking relief in the court system. 25 C.F.R. § 2.6 . There are clearly detailed administrative processes and remedies set forth in 25 C.F.R. Part 2 and 43 C.F.R. Part 4. Appellants, however, did not initiate even the first steps of the administrative appeal process. Instead, they asserted their claims for the first time in federal court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[p]ermitting imperfect but substantial compliance with a technical requirement is not the same as waiving the requirement altogether as a jurisdictional threshold.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.