Matthews v. Macanas’s Empirical Analysis
990 F.2d 467 · 1993
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Papa v. United States (2002), Alvarez-Machain v. United States (1996)
16 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · In re Disbarment of Johnson · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“although they may exercise powers of arrest provided that they are engaged in the enforcement of federal criminal law. Cal. Penal Code § 830.8 (a). Because federal officers are not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“during the time the plaintiff's criminal charges are pending. Under California law,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'distinctly put in issue and directly determined' in a previous criminal action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Berger v. Hanlon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.