Booth v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
990 F.2d 617 · 1993
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 155 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Fanning, Phillips & Molnar v. West (1998), Aerolineas Argentinas v. United States (1996)
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 32 U.S.C. § 709 (National Guard Technicians Act of 1968) · 5 U.S.C. § 7511 · 5 U.S.C. § 8337
Relies on United States v. Testan · United States v. Fausto · Rocovich v. United States · Hamlet v. United States · Early v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If, on a motion asserting the defense numbered (4) to dismiss for failure of the pleading to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A party, or the court sua sponte, may address a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction at any time, even on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e find that under the comprehensive and integrated review scheme of the CSRA, the Claims Court [now the United States Court of Federal Claims] (and any other court relying on Tucker Act jurisdiction) is not an ‘appropriate authority’ to review an agency’s personnel determination____ Post-CSRA, such an authority would include the agency itself, or the MSPB or the Federal Circuit, where those entities have the authority to review the agency’s determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.