Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 990 F.2d 812 - Moore v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Moore v. Eli Lilly & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

990 F.2d 812 · 1993

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools (1996), Stults v. Conoco, Inc. (1996)

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

5601993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here must be some proof that age motivated the employer's action, otherwise the law has been converted from one preventing discrimination because of age to one ensuring dismissals only for just cause to all people over 40.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he ADEA was not created to redress wrongful discharge simply because the terminated worker was over the age of forty. A discharge may well be unfair or even unlawful yet not be evidence of age bias under the ADEA. To make out an ADEA claim, the plaintiff must establish the existence of discrete facts that show some nexus between the employment actions taken by the employer and the employee’s age.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a mere refutation of the employer's legitimate nondiscriminatory reason.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.