Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 990 F.2d 998 - United States v. Bennett

United States v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

990 F.2d 998 · 1993

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. Barnes (1996), United States v. Chevalier (1993)

24 federal appellate ·

3201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Penson v. Ohio · Norman v. Reed · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Mabey v. Official Committee of Equity Security Holders · United States v. Osborne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a rule, noncompliance with Rule 11 constitutes reversible error in this circuit.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “make a recommendation, or agree[s] not to oppose the defendant's request, for a particular sentence, with the understanding that such recommendation or request shall not be binding on the court.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f the agreement is of the type specified in subdivision (e)(1)(B), the court shall advise the defendant that if the court does not accept the recommendation or request [for a particular sentence] the defendant nevertheless has no right to withdraw the plea.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.