DeSuze v. Ammon’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1715Z · 12 U.S.C. § 1715Z · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation · Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States · Miller v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. · Pearl v. City of Long Beach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e review the legal premises for [the district court's] conclusion de novo, the factual bases for clear error, and the ultimate decision for abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.