State v. Dahl’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Sullivan v. United States · Schwimmer v. Sony Corporation of America Venture Technology Inc · 126 Wash. 2d 244 - State v. Powell · 93 Wash. 2d 268 - State v. Dupard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) receive notice of the alleged violation; (2) be provided an opportunity to present documentary evidence and call witnesses when not unduly hazardous to institutional safety and correctional goals; and (3) receive a written statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for the disciplinary action.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“exercise of discretion will be informed by an accurate knowledge of the [offender's] behavior.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he minimal due process right to confront and cross-examine witnesses is not absolute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.