Brooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

106

cited by 106 later decisions

states following

March 2019

most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 99 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Salazar v. State (2001), Saldano v. State (2002)

6 federal appellate · 99 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Furman v. Georgia · McCleskey v. Kemp · Lee v. Brown · Clewis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“We have held that Article 32.01 has no application once an indictment is returned. Tatum v. State, 505 S.W.2d 548, 550 (Tex.Crim.App.1974). In this case, appellant waived his right to challenge the indictment since he filed his writ of habeas corpus almost a year and a half after the indictment was returned by the grand jury. Point of error seven is overruled”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Weiblen · State v. Bruni
“[A]ny error in admitting the [hearsay] evidence was harmless in light of other properly admitted evidence proving the same fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Prince v. State
“physical illness, mental condition, or emotional state which hinders one’s ability to perform one's duties as a juror” or (2)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Eban Stillwell v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.