Williams v. Rape’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc. · Chromalloy American Corp. v. Elyria Foundry Co. · King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints · Denny v. Mathieu · Johnson v. Raban
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Separate legal theories are not to be considered as separate claims, even if 'the several legal theories depend on different shadings of the facts, or would emphasize different elements of the facts, or would call for different measures of liability or different kinds of relief.' " King Gen. Contractors, Inc. , 821 S.W.2d at 501 (quoting Siesta Manor, Inc. v. Cmty. Fed. Savs. & Loan Ass'n , 716 S.W.2d 835 , 839 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986) ); see also Chesterfield Village, Inc. , 64 S.W.3d at 319-20 (stating courts look to the "factual bases for the claims, not the legal theories”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] dismissal with prejudice bars the assertion of the same cause of action or claim against the same party”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.