Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 990 SW2D 732 - Read v. Scott Fetzer Co.

Read v. Scott Fetzer Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Torrington Co. v. Stutzman (2001), City of Fort Worth v. Zimlich (2000)

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 45 state decisions

430199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin))

Relationships

Relies on Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co. · Smith v. Allwright · Transportation Insurance Co. v. Moriel · Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc. · Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One who entrusts work to an independent contractor, but who retains control of any part of the work, is subject to liability for physical harm to others for whose safety the employer owes a duty to exercise reasonable care, which is caused by his failure to exercise his control with reasonable care.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “A person of ordinary intelligence should anticipate that an unsuitable dealer [who had previously engaged in sexual misconduct] would pose a risk of harm”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.