Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 990 S.W.2d 789 - Olin Corp. v. Smith

Olin Corp. v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 200th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · In Re King's Estate · Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Cain v. Bain · Brown v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “• the extent to which the theory has been or can be tested; • the extent to which the technique relies upon the subjective interpretation of the expert; • whether the theory has been subjected to peer review and/or publication; • the technique’s potential rate of error; • whether the underlying theory or technique has been generally accepted as valid by the relevant scientific community; and • the non-judicial uses which have been made of the theory or technique.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Opinion testimony does not establish any material fact as a matter of law and is never binding on the trier of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.