Olin Corp. v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 200th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · In Re King's Estate · Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Cain v. Bain · Brown v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• the extent to which the theory has been or can be tested; • the extent to which the technique relies upon the subjective interpretation of the expert; • whether the theory has been subjected to peer review and/or publication; • the technique’s potential rate of error; • whether the underlying theory or technique has been generally accepted as valid by the relevant scientific community; and • the non-judicial uses which have been made of the theory or technique.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Opinion testimony does not establish any material fact as a matter of law and is never binding on the trier of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.