Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 991 F.2d 112 - United States v. Morrison

United States v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis

991 F.2d 112 · 1993

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably State v. Turner (2001), United States v. Stitt (2001)

17 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1901993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Henderson v. Kibbe · United States v. Park · Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission · United States v. Laughman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Constructive possession exists when the defendant exercises, or has power to exercise, dominion or control over the item.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Possession may be actual or constructive.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he circumstantial evidence was overwhelming indicating that there was a large ongoing retail drug trade being conducted from the residence since at least January.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.