Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 991 F.2d 163 - Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs’s Empirical Analysis

991 F.2d 163 · 1993

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
September 2019
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Kellstrom (1995), Conoco, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs (1999)

15 federal appellate ·

140199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Farrar v. Hobby · National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Delaware v. New York · Hallstrom v. Tillamook County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “correctly concluded that the Administrative Law Judge's order was supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole and is in accordance with law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In our review wetypically defer to the ALJ's credibility choices between conflicting witnesses and evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “entitles a claimant to reasonable and necessary medical services if he suffers a work-related injury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.