Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 991 F.2d 487 - Lee v. Armontrout

Lee v. Armontrout’s Empirical Analysis

991 F.2d 487 · 1993

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 2017
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2017 · most notably Bialas v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. (1995), Kinkead v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. (1995)

22 federal appellate · 1 district ·

280199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · United States Glass v. Medtronic Inc · Smith v. Marcantonio · Anthony Degidio v. Orville B. Pung · Wishon v. Gammon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “gross abuse of discretion resulting in fundamental unfairness at trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prison officials must test prisoners for tuberculosis and treat them ... if they test positive in order to prevent widespread infection”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.