Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 991 F.2d 511 - Mai Systems Corporation v. Peak Computer Inc Mai Systems Corporation

Mai Systems Corporation v. Peak Computer Inc Mai Systems Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

991 F.2d 511 · 1993

Citation profile

212
cited by 212 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 32 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 212 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably Washington v. Garrett (1993), Miller National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical Center (1994)

45 federal appellate · 32 district · 17 state decisions

9001993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bullock v. United States · Amf Incorporated v. Sleekcraft Boats E

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 212 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (b) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A party opposing a properly supported motion for summary judgment may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials in pleadings, but 'must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] plaintiff who seeks relief for misappropriation of trade secrets must identify the trade secrets and carry the burden of showing that they exist.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.