Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 991 F.2d 781 - In Re Graeme I. Bell, Leslie B. Rall and James P. Merryweather

In Re Graeme I. Bell, Leslie B. Rall and James P. Merryweather’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
May 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably Regents of the University of California v. Lilly & Co. (1997), In re Dembiczak (1999)

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

200199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Lockheed Shipbuilding Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs · Madrid v. Lawyers Title Insurance · Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “What a reference teaches and whether it teaches toward or away from the claimed invention are questions of fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he PTO's focus on Bell's method is misplaced. Bell does not claim a method. Bell claims compositions, and the issue is the obviousness of the claimed compositions, not of the method by which they are made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A prima facie case of obviousness is established when the teachings from the prior art itself would appear to have suggested the claimed subject matter to a person of ordinary skill in the art.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.