Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

991 F.2d 787

Docket No. 92-7225.

Peter Emmanuel Bernard v. Lonnie M. Saunders Edward C. Morris Edward W. Murray Larry D. Huffman

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: February 1, 1993 Decided: April 26, 1993

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-04-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Baker v. McDade

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-04-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-92-391)

Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Peter Emmanuel Bernard appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bernard v. Saunders, No. CA-92-391 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We have considered Bernard's supplemental pleadings

/991/f2d/787 · .json · Public domain