Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

991 F.2d 787

Docket No. 92-7117.

Buckner v. Schaefer

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: February 16, 1993 Decided: April 1, 1993

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-04-01

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)

Relies on Baker v. McDade

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-04-01

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Norman P. Ramsey, District Judge. (CA-92-393-R)

Robert Leon Buckner, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Robert Leon Buckner appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court's order dismissing his action under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1988), and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (1988), without prejudice to his right to refile, for failing to serve the Defendants with copies of his summons and complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/991/f2d/787 · .json · Public domain