Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 991 P2D 80 - State v. Wadsworth

State v. Wadsworth’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably State v. Brown (2000), State v. Sullivan (2001)

41 state decisions

270200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 930

Relies on Mistretta v. United States · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Porzig v. Nolden · Relford v. Commandant, U. S. Disciplinary Barracks · United States v. Wiltberger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Legislature has an established practice of defining prohibited acts in general terms, leaving to the judicial and executive branches the task of establishing specifics”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “This court has recognized the inherent power and obligation of the judiciary to control all its necessary functions to promote the effective administration of justice.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “An integral part of any court's duty to administer justice and fairly adjudicate disputes is to ensure that all parties have the opportunity to advance their cause in an atmosphere of safety, decorum, and fairness.... Thus, because the providers of court security play an integral role in the most fundamental function of any court, the adjudicatory function, it is an improper encroachment on the judiciary's power for the legislature to mandate the provider of court security.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.