Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 991 SW2D 408 - Webb v. State

Webb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 182nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Gooding v. Wilson · Watts v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly harms or threatens to harm another by an unlawful act: (1) in retaliation for or on account of the service of another as a public servant, witness, prospective witness, informant, or a person who has reported or who the actor knows intends to report the occurrence of a crime; or (2) to prevent or delay the service of another as a public servant, witness, prospective witness, informant, or a person who has reported or who the actor know intends to report the occurrence of a crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “intentionally or knowingly intended to harm [complainant] by an unlawful act in retaliation for or on account of her service as a prospective witness, as a person who has reported the occurrence of a crime, or a person who [defendant] knew intended to report the occurrence of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.