Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 991 SW2D 430 - Ramos v. State

Ramos v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 263rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Almanza v. State · Geesa v. State · Harris v. State · Highwarden v. State · Bigby v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Though not mentioned in Almanza , the nature of the error and its potential for harm are important threshold considerations that ought to guide the harm analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.