Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 992 F.2d 1009 - United States v. Beamon

United States v. Beamon’s Empirical Analysis

992 F.2d 1009 · 1993

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
6
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably United States v. Schlei (1997), State v. Coffin (1999)

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

4401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Doggett v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Oklahoma v. New Mexico

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether delay before trial was uncommonly long, whether the government or the criminal defendant is more to blame for that delay, whether, in due course, the defendant asserted his right to a speedy trial, and whether he suffered prejudice as the delay's result.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “show that the period between [accusation] and trial passes a threshold point of presumptively prejudicial delay”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy ... trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.