United States v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
992 F.2d 1126 · 1993
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably United States v. Munoz (1998), United States v. Joe (1993)
21 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Huddleston v. United States · United States v. Miller · Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services · Lockheed Shipbuilding Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]or purposes of barring a future prosecution, it is the judgment and not the indictment alone which acts as a bar, and the entire record may be considered in evaluating a subsequent claim of double jeopardy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he government merely had to produce evidence at trial from which the jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that [the] [d]efendant had [possessed] a firearm . . . and was not required to prove that the firearm was a .38 caliber revolver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“neither the evidence at trial nor the jury instructions implied that Defendant could be convicted of anything other than knowingly using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.