Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 992 F.2d 131 - United States v. Jimenez

United States v. Jimenez’s Empirical Analysis

992 F.2d 131 · 1993

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably United States v. Fish (1994), United States v. Schilling (1998)

25 federal appellate ·

280199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Santobello v. New York · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Luster v. Cushman · United States v. Benchimol

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “counsel's performance 'fell below an objective standard of reasonableness[ ]' [and] there exists 'a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[u]pon motion of the government stating that the defendant has provided substantial assistance in the investigation . . . of another person who has committed an offense, the court may depart from the guidelines.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The government must fulfill any promise that it expressly or impliedly makes in exchange for a defendant's guilty plea.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.