Resolution Trust Corp. v. Sharif-Munir-Davidson Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
992 F.2d 1398 · 1993
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Winters v. Diamond Shamrock Chemical Co. (1998), Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara (2004)
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Foman v. Davis · D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When there is no notice to the nonmovant, summary judgment will be considered harmless if the nonmovant has no additional evidence or if all of the nonmovant's additional evidence is reviewed by the appellate court and none of the evidence presents a genuine issue of material fact.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[i]t only bars those defenses of which FDIC could not have been put on notice by reviewing records on file with the bank.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 56(e) ... requires the nonmoving party to go beyond the pleadings and by her own affidavits, or by the 'depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file,' designate 'specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.