Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 992 F.2d 286 - Swoboda v. Dubach

Swoboda v. Dubach’s Empirical Analysis

992 F.2d 286 · 1993

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Cone v. Longmont United Hospital Ass'n (1994), Elizabeth Perry v. Judy Woodward the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo (1999)

50 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

640199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Graham v. Connor · Houston v. Lack · Cruz v. Beto · Hall v. Bellmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] pro se prisoner's notice of appeal is filed with the court at the time petitioner delivered it to the prison authorities.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “specific facts connecting the allegedly unconstitutional conditions with [their] own experiences [in the prison], or indicat[e] how the conditions caused [them] injury,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In determining whether a plaintiff has stated a claim, the district court may not look to ... any other pleading outside the complaint itself....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.