United States v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
992 F.2d 295 · 1993
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
February 2009
most recently cited
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on New Jersey Department of Corrections v. Nash · United States v. Pennell · United States v. Everett · United States v. Contreras · United States v. Conway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.