Bankr L Rep P 75226 in the Matter of Gerald E Geise Jr’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably 67 Cal. App. 4th 995 - Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998), Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc. (1997)
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. · Sullivan v. United States · Stover v. Rau · Sierra Switchboard Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Fink v. O'Neil
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he purpose of section 522(b)(2)(A) is to afford a state an opportunity to substitute its judgment for that of the Congress with respect to what property ought to be excluded from the bankruptcy estate. Our basic task, therefore, is to discern the will of the state legislature: what was the exemption scheme that the legislature wished to make available to the state’s residents as an alternative to the federal exemptions set forth in the Bankruptcy Code?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burciaga v. Moglia · In Re Sebio“While state courts frequently refer to statutes which prohibit only certain forms of judicial process as “exemption” statutes, the term “exemption” conventionally connotes protection against all forms of process.... [I]t is appropriate, in our view, to give the word its common meaning in the absence of any legislative indication to the contrary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burciaga v. Moglia · In Re Mayer“determine[ ] what is property of the estate by a simple reference to what interests in property the debtor has at the commencement of the case. This includes all interests, such as ... tangible and intangible property, choses in action, [and] causes of action ... whether or not transferable by the debtor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.