Killebrew v. Endicott’s Empirical Analysis
992 F.2d 660 · 1993
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2019
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Neil v. Biggers · Rhode Island v. Innis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest or custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether a reasonable objective observer would believe that the encounter was 'reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect' and therefore constituted the 'functional equivalent' of interrogation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“tall, weighing 260 pounds, with a small beard and mustache. The length of time between the crime and the confrontation was short--two weeks. Beno never wavered in his identification. 4 The Illinois Appellate Court balanced these factors against the fact that Beno saw the newspaper photograph, and held that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.