Mark Bell Furniture Warehouse Incorporated Mark Bell Furniture Warehouse Incorporated v. Dm Reid Associates Ltd’s Empirical Analysis
992 F.2d 7 · 1993
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 10 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Rome v. Braunstein (1994), Century 21 Balfour Real Estate v. Menna (1994)
17 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 303 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 11 U.S.C. § 726
Relies on Raphan v. United States · Zerman v. Melton · Abbotts Dairies of Pennsylvania Inc Cumberland Farms Dairy Inc 85-1543 National Farmers' Organization Inc 85-1544 · Onouli-Kona Land Co. v. Estate of Richards · Kowal v. Malkemus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one who buys property in good faith and for value, without knowledge of adverse claims.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The reversal or modification on appeal of an authorization under subsection (b) or (c) of this section of a sale or lease of property does not affect the validity of a sale or lease under such authorization to an entity that purchased or leased such property in good faith, whether or not such entity knew of the pendency of the appeal, unless such authorization and such sale or lease were stayed pending appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not encompass the fraudulent intent alleged by LaSalle: `Good faith' purchaser status is precluded by ... fraud, collusion with the trustee, and taking `grossly unfair advantage' of other bidders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.