United States v. Garza-Juarez’s Empirical Analysis
992 F.2d 896 · 1993
Citation profile
110 federal appellate · 5 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 181 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2025 · most notably United States v. Davis (1994), United States v. Koon (1994)
110 federal appellate · 5 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Carolina v. Pearce · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · United States v. Russell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 181 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only when the government's conduct is so grossly shocking and so outrageous as to violate the universal sense of justice.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“charges of increased severity were filed because the accused exercised a statutory, procedural or constitutional right in circumstances that give rise to an appearance of vindictiveness.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[E]vidence of predisposition may arise both before the government's initial contact and during the course of dealings.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.