United States v. Binghamn’s Empirical Analysis
992 F.2d 975 · 1993
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2023
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · United States v. Naftalin · A. T. Brod & Co. v. Jack Perlow and Adele Perlow, Also Known as Adele Wagner · United States v. Tager
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[m]ateriality must be judged in the context of the `total mix' of information available to investors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. SEC v. Phan“would always find a buyer's or seller's status as a corporate officer to be of interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. SEC v. Lemelson“far too abstract to satisfy the materiality requirement in a particular case,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. SEC v. Phan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.