Emmanuel v. Handy Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna · Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson · Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc. · Privitera v. Curran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“United States v. George, 886 F.3d 31, 49 (1st Cir. 2018). - 23 - the unconscionability of the modification clause so infects the Agreement that severing that clause would effectively rewrite the bargained-for exchange as to arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must be considered by the arbitrator in the first instance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“as a matter of substantive federal arbitration law,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.