Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 992 FSUPP 897 - Brinson v. McKeeman

Brinson v. McKeeman’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Heck v. Humphrey · Malley v. Briggs · Daniels v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “access to typewriters and copy machines is not an essential part of the right of access to the courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.