Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 992 FSUPP2D 302 - Daniel v. T & M Protection Resources, Inc.

Daniel v. T & M Protection Resources, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (§ 2 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd. · Harris v. Mills · Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “draw[ ] all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Doe v. Putnam Cnty. · Colon v. Annucci
  2. “[f]or the purpose of resolving [a] motion to dismiss, the Court ... draw[s] all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. O'Neill v. Standard Homeopathic Co. · Festa v. Westchester Med. Ctr. Health Network
  3. “exercised a measure of control over the hiring, firing, supervision, leave, and discipline”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Popat v. Levy

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.