Steadman v. Hindman’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2021
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey · Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth · H. L., Etc. v. Scott M. Matheson et al. · Matter of Title, Ballot Title, Sub. Cl. · In re Breene
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i] mplementation details that are ‘directly tied’ to the initiative's ‘central focus’ do not constitute a separate subject,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Polhill · In the MATTER OF the TITLE, BALLOT TITLE AND SUBMISSION CLAUSE FOR 2021-2022 16 Janie VanWinkle, Carlyle Currier, Chris Kraft, Terri Diane Lamers, William Hammerich, and Joyce Kelly v. Alexander Sage and Brent Johannes, and Theresa Conley, David Powell, and Julie Pelegrin, Title Board.“(internal quotation marks omitted)); see also In re Proposed Initiative for 1997-98 # 74, 962 P.2d 927, 929 (Colo.1998) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Polhill · In the MATTER OF the TITLE, BALLOT TITLE AND SUBMISSION CLAUSE FOR 2021-2022 16 Janie VanWinkle, Carlyle Currier, Chris Kraft, Terri Diane Lamers, William Hammerich, and Joyce Kelly v. Alexander Sage and Brent Johannes, and Theresa Conley, David Powell, and Julie Pelegrin, Title Board.“at least two distinct and separate purposes that are not dependent upon or connected with each other.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.