Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 992 So. 2d 1165 - Ruffin v. State

992 So. 2d 1165 - Ruffin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Enmund v. Florida · United States v. Bailey · Duckworth v. Eagan · California v. Prysock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the defendant was under an unlawful and present, imminent, and impending threat of such a nature as to induce a well-grounded apprehension of death or serious bodily injury; (2) that he had not recklessly or negligently placed himself in the situation; (3) that he had no reasonable legal alternative to violating the law; (4) that a direct causal relationship may be reasonably anticipated between the criminal action and the avoidance of harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant is entitled to have jury instructions given which present his theory of the case[;] however, this entitlement is limited in that the court may refuse an instruction which incorrectly states the law, is covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, or is without foundation in the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.