992 So. 2d 120 - Henyard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Gregg v. Georgia · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Atkins v. Virginia · Marks v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e have previously concluded in Lightbourne and Schwab that the Florida protocols do not violate any of the possible standards, and that holding cannot conflict with the narrow holding in Baze”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Given the record in Lightbourne and our extensive analysis in our opinion in Lightbourne v. McCollum , we reject the conclusion that lethal injection as applied in Florida is unconstitutional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tompkins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.