Strand v. Escambia County’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 810 So. 2d 901 - Puryear v. State · 880 So. 2d 602 - Florida Dept. of Children and Fam. v. Fl · 875 So. 2d 383 - Perlow v. Berg-Perlow · 866 So. 2d 612 - NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. State · 918 So. 2d 250 - Fla. Dept. of Rev. v. City of Gainesville
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Has the prior decision proved unworkable due to reliance on an impractical legal “fiction”? (2) Can the rule of law announced in the decision be reversed without serious injustice to those who have relied on it and without serious disruption in the stability of the law? And (3) have the factual premises underlying the decision changed so drastically as to leave the decision’s central holding utterly without legal justification?”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Counties, school districts, municipalities, special districts and local governmental bodies with taxing powers may issue bonds, certificates of indebtedness or any form of tax anticipation certificates, payable from ad valorem taxation and maturing more than twelve months after issuance only: (a) to finance or refinance capital projects authorized by law and only when approved by vote of the electors who are owners of freeholds therein not wholly exempt from taxation....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“trial court's findings of fact for substantial competent evidence and its conclusions of law de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.