Sustakoski v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 961 So. 2d 211 - State v. Hearns · 808 So. 2d 145 - Darling v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the appellant did not challenge his convictions other than for their failure to contain legible fingerprints.”); Johnson v. State, 936 So.2d 672, 674 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (affirming enhanced sentence where”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.