992 So. 2d 330 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 533 So. 2d 744 - Bryan v. State · 753 So. 2d 9 - Zack v. State · 944 So. 2d 1207 - Dorsett v. State · Richardson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[m]ost evidence that is admitted will be prejudicial or damaging to the party . against whom it is offered.” Charles W. Ehrhardt, [Florida Evidence § 403.1 (2007) ] at 183. The question under the statute is not prejudice but instead, unfair prejudice: whether the “probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.” § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2005) (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the identical weapon was used in all three of the armed robberies”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Collins“); Fernandez v. State, 722 So.2d 879, 880 (Fla.App.1998) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Collins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.