992 So. 2d 692 - Classroomdirect. Com, LLC v. DRAPHIX, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

20 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"`Where evidence is presented to the trial court ore tenus, a presumption of correctness exists as to the court's conclusions on issues of fact; its determination will not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous, without supporting evidence, manifestly unjust, or against the great weight of the evidence. However, when the trial court improperly applies the law to the facts, no presumption of correctness exists as to the court's judgment.' " American Petroleum Equip. & Constr., Inc. v. Fancher, 708 So.2d 129, 132 (Ala. 1997) (citations omitted)."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Oak Grove Resources, LLC v. White · 40 So. 3d 683 - Kappa Sigma Fraternity v. Price-Williams

2. “"[T]his Court's caselaw is well settled that the taxation of costs is discretionary with the trial court. See, e.g. , Smith v. Smith , 482 So.2d 1172 , 1175 (Ala. 1985) ('The taxation of costs pursuant to [ Rule 54(d), Ala. R. Civ. P.,] is generally left to the sound discretion of the trial judge.'); Vulcan Oil Co. v. Gorman , 434 So.2d 760 , 762 (Ala. 1983) ('[T]he taxation of costs ... rests in the discretion of the trial judge, whose decision will not be reversed unless clear abuse is shown.')."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Thomas v. Heard · Ladd v. Stockham

3. “[A] permanent injunction is reviewed de novo.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 39 So. 3d 1049 - Byrne v. Galliher · 40 So. 3d 683 - Kappa Sigma Fraternity v. Price-Williams