992 So. 2d 762 - Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““the existence of the following statutory aggravating circumstances: (1) that the capital offense was committed while ■Marshall was under sentence of imprisonment; (2) that Marshall had previously been convicted of-a felony involving the use or threat of violence- to the person; and (3) that Marshall was engaged in the commission of a burglary at the time the capital offense was committed. “The trial court found no statutory mitigating circumstances existed. It further found that there were no non-statutory mitigating circumstances.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Marshall v. State