Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

992 So. 2d 865

Docket No. 5D07-3526.

Cogen v. Cogen

Michael A. COGEN, Appellant, v. Kirsten W. COGEN, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 3, 2008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-10-03

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2015

4 state decisions

Relies on Hill v. Hooten · Fullerton v. Fullerton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-10-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Michael S. Burnett and Sherri K. DeWitt, of DeWitt Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

¶2Andrea L. Davis, of Law Offices of Andrea L. Davis, P.A., Longwood, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The former husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We find that it was error to award rehabilitative alimony where the former wife failed to present evidence of a rehabilitative plan. See Hill v. Hooten, 776 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Fullerton v. Fullerton, 709 So.2d 162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

¶5On remand, the trial court is to recalculate child support based on the parties' respective incomes as previously determined by the general magistrate.[1] The final judgment is otherwise affirmed.

¶6AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

¶7MONACO, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

NOTES

¶8[1] The case was tried before a general magistrate. Her report and recommendations were approved and adopted by the trial court.

/992/so2d/865 · .json · Public domain