Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

992 S.W.2d 219

State v. Holman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1999

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1999-03-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2002

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-03-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of forgery, in violation of Section 570.090 RSMo (1994), on which count he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to twenty years imprisonment.

¶3No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/992/sw2d/219 · .json · Public domain