Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 993 F.2d 1328 - Cole v. Bone

Cole v. Bone’s Empirical Analysis

993 F.2d 1328 · 1993

Citation profile

227
cited by 227 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

88 federal appellate · 16 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 227 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2023 · most notably Brosseau v. Haugen (2004), Dickerson v. Mcclellan (1996)

88 federal appellate · 16 district · 4 state decisions

14701993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 227 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 56. Summary Judgment (b) For Defending Party. A party against whom a claim ... is asserted ... may, at any time, move for summary judgment in the party’s favor as to all or any part thereof. (c) Motions and Proceedings Thereon.... The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    52 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we scrutinize only the seizure itself, not the events leading to the seizure”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable seizures, not unreasonable or ill-advised conduct in general.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.